 |
|
| Comparison Table between Coaxial Cable and Air@-EL300 |
| (Case Profile:40Floors High Rise Building/Internal Data) |
|
|
Conventional Coaxial Cable |
Air@-EL300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance & Repair Cost |
|
| |
Frequent cable damage from operation friction |
| |
Regular maintenance check is required. |
| |
New cable wiring is necessary when there is cable damage.(Cable damage can occur every 8 month in average.) |
| |
High labor cost and elevator operation halt |
| |
High material cost (needs to use stranded types flex coaxial cable) |
| |
Buildings higher than 40 floors need more installation & maintenance cost, troubles. |
|
| |
No maintenance |
| |
No repair |
| |
Semi-Permanent life span |
| |
No cost increases. Operation range up to 300m(990ft) height buildings. |
|
|
|
| |
Cracking in coaxial cable causes intermittent video signal drops. |
| |
Coaxial cable can be tangled with elevator traveling cables, raising safety concerns. |
|
| |
No cable-related problems |
|
|
|
|
| |
3-year warranty from date of purchase |
|